Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01459-CMA-KLM
05-29-2012
MINUTE ORDER
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Find BOP in Contempt of Court [Docket No. 220; Filed May 24, 2012] (the "Motion"). The federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") is not a party to this lawsuit, thus the Court has no authority to hold the BOP in contempt of court, assuming a legitimate basis to do so existed. Furthermore, Plaintiff does not identify a Defendant to whom his allegations are directed. The Court thus has no jurisdictional basis to evaluate the relief requested, in the absence of a named Defendant to whom the allegedly violative acts may be attributed. See Little v. Jones, 607 F.3d 1245, 1251 (10th Cir. 2010) (affirming the denial of a motion for preliminary injunction on the basis that the incarcerated pro se plaintiff had not "alleged that the defendants named in the complaint participated in the alleged deprivations . . . ."). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.