From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huerta v. Phillips 66 Co.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Aug 18, 2021
3:19-cv-00213 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 18, 2021)

Opinion

3:19-cv-00213

08-18-2021

JOSEPH HUERTA, v. PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On February 23, 2021, all dispositive and non-dispositive pretrial matters in this case were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). See Dkt. 31. Judge Edison filed a memorandum and recommendation on July 29, 2021, recommending that Defendant Phillips 66 Company's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 23) be granted and this case dismissed. See Dkt. 34.

No objections have been filed to the memorandum and recommendation. Accordingly, the court reviews it for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly:

(1) Judge Edison's memorandum and recommendation (Dkt. 34) is approved and adopted in its entirety as the holding of the court;
(2) Defendant Phillips 66 Company's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 23) is granted; and
(3) This case is dismissed with prejudice. A final judgment will be separately entered.


Summaries of

Huerta v. Phillips 66 Co.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Aug 18, 2021
3:19-cv-00213 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Huerta v. Phillips 66 Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH HUERTA, v. PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Aug 18, 2021

Citations

3:19-cv-00213 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 18, 2021)

Citing Cases

Haynes v. Wal-Mart Super Ctr.

Joseph Huerta v. Phillips 66 Co., Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-00213, 2021 WL 3671199, at *4 (S.D. Tex. July 29,…