From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson Val. Nat. Bk. v. Blod-Nick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1996
234 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 2, 1996.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of implied contract, the defendant Blod-nick, Abramowitz, Newman, Schultz and Bass, P. C, and the defendants Edward Blodnick, Arnold Ambramowitz, Frederick Newman, Andrew Schultz, and John Bass appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), entered August 14, 1995, which denied their motion to renew their prior motion for summary judgment.

Before: Rosenblatt, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellants' motion for renewal ( see, CPLR 2221; Karlin v Bridges, 172 AD2d 644; Sciascia v Nevins, 130 AD2d 649; Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558).


Summaries of

Hudson Val. Nat. Bk. v. Blod-Nick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1996
234 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Hudson Val. Nat. Bk. v. Blod-Nick

Case Details

Full title:HUDSON VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, Respondent, v. BLOD-NICK, ABRAMOWTTZ, NEWMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 323