From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 8, 1984
444 So. 2d 598 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-1356.

February 8, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Russell E. Seay, Jr., J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Gary Caldwell, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lydia M. Valenti, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Evidence of similar facts is admissible for any purpose if relevant to any material issue, other than propensity or bad character, even though such evidence points to commission of another crime. Drake v. State, 400 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1981); Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1959); Section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1982). Our review of the record also reveals that the State did in fact establish ownership and identity of the stolen property by competent, substantial evidence. Johnson v. State, 353 So.2d 889 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). See also, State v. Fort, 380 So.2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, C.J., dissents without opinion.


Summaries of

Hudson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 8, 1984
444 So. 2d 598 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Hudson v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL HUDSON, A/K/A DAVID SANDS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 8, 1984

Citations

444 So. 2d 598 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Crowell v. State

Hodges v. State, 403 So.2d 1375 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), review denied, 413 So.2d 877 (Fla. 1982). It is…