From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. N.Y. Statw Dutches Cnty. Didtrict Attorney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 19, 2021
21 CIVIL 626 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2021)

Opinion

21 CIVIL 626 (PMH)

02-19-2021

ROBERT HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATW DUTCHES COUNTY DIDTRICT ATTORNEY, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated February 18, 2021, the Court construes the pleadings as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and denies it without prejudice to Petitioner's filing another such petition once he has exhausted his available state court remedies; because the petition makes no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue; the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. DATED: New York, New York

February 19, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Hudson v. N.Y. Statw Dutches Cnty. Didtrict Attorney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 19, 2021
21 CIVIL 626 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Hudson v. N.Y. Statw Dutches Cnty. Didtrict Attorney

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATW DUTCHES COUNTY DIDTRICT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 19, 2021

Citations

21 CIVIL 626 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2021)