Opinion
18 CIVIL 4483 (GHW)
03-31-2020
JUDGMENT
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 31, 2020, Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted; Hudson has failed to remedy the deficiencies the Court identified in his original complaint. Because the Court has already granted Hudson leave to replead once and Hudson has failed to cure the deficiencies in his pleading, the Court concludes that repleading would be futile. Accordingly, the Court will not again grant Hudson leave to replead. See Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc., 106 F.3d 11, 18 (2d Cir. 1997) (explaining that leave to amend need not be granted where the proposed amendment would be futile), and the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York
March 31, 2020
RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerk of Court
BY: /s/ _________
Deputy Clerk