Hudson v. Lancaster State Prison

Full title: MARCO HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. LANCASTER STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Dec 4, 2009

CV 05-8397 SJO (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2009)

Opinion

MARCO HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. LANCASTER STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. No. CV 05-8397 SJO (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. December 4, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

         IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss is granted and that plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend.