From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Heyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 23, 2015
Case No. 1:15-cv-151 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 23, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:15-cv-151

06-23-2015

MITCHELL HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. DR. T. HEYD, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 5)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court, and, on June 1, 2015, submitted a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 5). Plaintiff did not file objections.

As required by 29 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety. Accordingly:

1. This civil action is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution;

2. This civil action is TERMINATED from the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 6/23/2015

/s/Timothy S . Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hudson v. Heyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 23, 2015
Case No. 1:15-cv-151 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Hudson v. Heyd

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. DR. T. HEYD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:15-cv-151 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 23, 2015)