From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson Ins. Co. v. GM Mech. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 12, 2013
Case No. 3:12CV276 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12CV276

04-12-2013

HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. GM MECHANICAL INC., et al., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent Case)


ORDER

This is a consent case for which the Court, on April 12, 2013, held an informal discovery conference, by telephone, with counsel for both sides. Eric Kjellander, Esq. then appeared with Lynnette Dinkler on behalf of Plaintiff, and Walter Reynolds, Esq. appeared on behalf of Defendants. Mr. Kjellander, who was permitted to participate in the conference, is DIRECTED to promptly file a motion to appear pro hac vice.

Counsel for both sides asked the Court to extend the Discovery Deadline and all related dates 90 days. For good cause shown, this request is GRANTED and the Calendar is SO MODIFIED. This case, therefore, shall proceed as follows:

Discovery Deadline: July 22, 2013; and

Dispositive Motions Deadline: August 22, 2013.

The status conference initially scheduled for June 18, 2013 is RESCHEDULED to September 18, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. A trial date will be scheduled, if appropriate, following the Court's ruling on summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Hudson Ins. Co. v. GM Mech. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 12, 2013
Case No. 3:12CV276 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Hudson Ins. Co. v. GM Mech. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. GM MECHANICAL INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12CV276 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 12, 2013)