From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudgins v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 8, 2014
Case No. 13-11602 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 8, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 13-11602

07-08-2014

Marvin Hudgins, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Sean F. Cox

United States District Court Judge


ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Marvin Hudgins ("Plaintiff") brought this action challenging the Commissioner's unfavorable decision denying Plaintiff's claim for a period of disability, for disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income benefits. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Charles Binder for determination of all non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Report and Recommendation pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C).

Thereafter, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued on June 16, 2014, Magistrate Judge Binder recommended that this Court: 1) Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; and 2) Grant the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment, affirming the findings and conclusions of the Commissioner.

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. "The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made." Id.

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither party has filed objections to the R&R.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the June 16, 2014, R&R. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and that the Commissioner's findings and conclusions are AFFIRMED.

__________

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on July 8, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Jennifer McCoy

Case Manager


Summaries of

Hudgins v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 8, 2014
Case No. 13-11602 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Hudgins v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Marvin Hudgins, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 8, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-11602 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 8, 2014)

Citing Cases

Fields v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Also, the Commissioner refutes plaintiff's claim that the ALJ's characterization of her work activity after…