From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huber v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 17, 2013
Case No. 3:11-cv-008 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-008

2013-09-17

JOSEPH W. HUBER, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Respondent.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PETITIONER'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 25), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired on September 9, 2013, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment be, and it hereby is, DENIED.

________________________

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Huber v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 17, 2013
Case No. 3:11-cv-008 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Huber v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH W. HUBER, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Sep 17, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-008 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 17, 2013)