Hubbard v. Marshall

Full title: VINCENT HUBBARD, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH MARSHALL, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Jul 15, 2010

CV 07-2872 GAF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2010)

Opinion

VINCENT HUBBARD, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH MARSHALL, Defendant. No. CV 07-2872 GAF (FFM). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. July 15, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Second Amended Complaint is stricken; (2) defendants Vardaro and Wong are dismissed with prejudice; and (3) defendant Marshall is required to file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this order.