From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubbard v. Lamas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 9, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-6596 (E.D. Pa. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-6596

05-09-2013

MICHAEL HUBBARD v. MARIOSA LAMAS, et al.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of May 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, to which no objections have been filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition is DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY FILED;
3. Petitioner's Motion for a Stay and Abeyance [Doc. No. 25] is DISMISSED AS MOOT;
4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability; and
5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE , J.


Summaries of

Hubbard v. Lamas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 9, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-6596 (E.D. Pa. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Hubbard v. Lamas

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HUBBARD v. MARIOSA LAMAS, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-6596 (E.D. Pa. May. 9, 2013)