From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HTC Corp. v. INVT SPE LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 15, 2021
No. 2020-1790 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2020-1790 2020-1791

11-15-2021

HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., Appellants v. INVT SPE LLC, Appellee

Darren Matthew Franklin, Sheppard, Mullin, Rich-ter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellants. Also represented by Martin Bader, Stephen S. Korniczky, Ericka Schulz, San Diego, CA. Cyrus Alcorn Morton, Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by John K. Harting, Brenda L. Joly, Christopher Seidl; Li Zhu, Berkeley, CA.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-01555, IPR2018-01581.

Darren Matthew Franklin, Sheppard, Mullin, Rich-ter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellants. Also represented by Martin Bader, Stephen S. Korniczky, Ericka Schulz, San Diego, CA.

Cyrus Alcorn Morton, Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by John K. Harting, Brenda L. Joly, Christopher Seidl; Li Zhu, Berkeley, CA.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Per Curiam

Newman, Taranto, and Chen, Circuit Judges

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

HTC Corp. v. INVT SPE LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 15, 2021
No. 2020-1790 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
Case details for

HTC Corp. v. INVT SPE LLC

Case Details

Full title:HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., Appellants v. INVT SPE LLC, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 15, 2021

Citations

No. 2020-1790 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)