Summary
In HSBC Bank USA v. Picarelli, 23 Misc.3d 1135(A), 2009 WL 1585773, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op 51107(U) [Sup Ct Queens County 2009] [decision by the undersigned], the plaintiff HSBC Bank USA previously moved for summary judgment in its favor as against defendants Picarelli and Rappold, to strike the answer of those defendants, for leave to appoint a referee to compute the total sums due and owing plaintiff, and for leave to amend the caption as proposed.
Summary of this case from HSBC Bank USA v. PicarelliOpinion
No. 27632008.
April 14, 2009.
Mortgages — Foreclosure. Consumer Protection — Truth in Lending.