Opinion
April 25, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that there are questions of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment, including whether the appellant and the plaintiff had established an attorney-client relationship (see generally, Rudnitsky v Robbins, 191 A.D.2d 488; Bass Ullman v Chanes, 185 A.D.2d 750; Gardner v Jacon, 148 A.D.2d 794; Mazzei v Pokorny, Schrenzel Pokorny, 125 A.D.2d 374; cf., Sucese v Kirsch, 199 A.D.2d 718; McGlynn v Gurda, 184 A.D.2d 980). Bracken, J.P., Miller, O'Brien and Altman, JJ., concur.