From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howze v. Frisk

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 15, 2024
23-cv-00125-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-00125-RS (PR)

04-15-2024

JOHNNY L. HOWZE, Plaintiff, v. J. FRISK, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RICHARD SEEBORG CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Mail sent by the Court to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. (Dkt. No. 10.) Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute this matter, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Howze v. Frisk

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 15, 2024
23-cv-00125-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Howze v. Frisk

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY L. HOWZE, Plaintiff, v. J. FRISK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 15, 2024

Citations

23-cv-00125-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2024)