From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HOWL v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Feb 23, 2011
Case No. 2:08-cv-00038 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-00038.

February 23, 2011


ORDER


Pending before the Court are both Plaintiff Anita Farley Howl's Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. No. 11) ("Plaintiff's Motion") and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 15) ("Defendant's Motion"), a responsive filing to which Plaintiff filed a Reply (Doc. No. 17). Subsequently, Magistrate Judge Griffin issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 18) ("Report") recommending that Plaintiff's Motion should be denied, that Defendant's Motion should be granted, and that the Commissioner's decision should be affirmed. Id. at 49. The Report was filed on January 10, 2011, and neither party has raised any objections to date.

Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's Motion, GRANTS Defendant's Motion, and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner.

It is so ORDERED.

Entered this 22nd day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

HOWL v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Feb 23, 2011
Case No. 2:08-cv-00038 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 23, 2011)
Case details for

HOWL v. ASTRUE

Case Details

Full title:ANITA FARLEY HOWL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-00038 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 23, 2011)

Citing Cases

Murray v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

In evaluating whether an individual's major function has been restored under Listing 1.08, or its predecessor…