Opinion
Argued March 19, 1889
Decided March 26, 1889
Charles R. Hall for appellant.
Thomas W. Fitzgerald for respondent.
DANFORTH, J., reads for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Howitt v. Merrill
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 26, 1889
20 N.E. 868 (N.Y. 1889)
Summaries of
Howitt v. Merrill
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 26, 1889
20 N.E. 868 (N.Y. 1889)
Case details for
Howitt v. Merrill
Case Details
Full title:WILLIAM M. HOWITT, Appellant, v . ISAIAH M. MERRILL, Impleaded, etc.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 26, 1889
Citations
20 N.E. 868 (N.Y. 1889)
20 N.E. 868
22 N.Y. St. Rptr. 619
Citing Cases
Renfro v. Nixon
Conceding laches may bar the attorney's right to have the satisfaction set aside, no parties have died nor…
Publishers' Printing Co. v. Gillin Printing Co.The remedy in such a case is to move to vacate the satisfaction, to the extent of the attorney's lien; and…