From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 4, 2021
323 So. 3d 364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-3754

08-04-2021

Dalain L. HOWELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Dalain L. Howell, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Dalain L. Howell, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam. The Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Lewis, Osterhaus, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Howell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 4, 2021
323 So. 3d 364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Howell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dalain L. HOWELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 4, 2021

Citations

323 So. 3d 364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)