From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 25, 1984
318 S.E.2d 811 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

68137.

DECIDED MAY 25, 1984.

Workers' compensation. Catoosa Superior Court. Before Judge Loggins.

Maurice M. Sponcler, Jr., for appellants.

Don L. Hartman, Robert A. Wharton, Jr., for appellee.


Michael Parker was injured while in the course of his employment with Lamar Essex. Essex was an independent contractor hired by appellants Billy Howell (d/b/a H H Construction Co.) and Randy Bell (d/b/a Aaron Associates) for work on a residential construction site. Parker filed a workers' compensation claim against Essex, who, although primarily liable, did not have workers' compensation insurance. The ALJ dismissed Parker's claim against the general contractors, Howell and Bell, on the basis that they were not subject to the Georgia Workers' Compensation Act because they did not have the three employees required by OCGA § 34-9-2 (a), either individually or as a joint venture nor had they voluntarily elected to be bound by the Act. The State Board of Workers' Compensation reversed the ALJ finding Howell and Bell liable under the statutory employer provision, OCGA § 34-9-8 (a), and the Superior Court of Catoosa County affirmed the Board's award. We granted the application for discretionary review and now reverse.

This case is controlled by the recent Supreme Court decision in Bradshaw v. Glass, 252 Ga. 429 ( 314 S.E.2d 233) (1984). It is uncontroverted that neither appellant, individually nor jointly, had a sufficient number of employees to meet the requirement of OCGA § 34-9-2 (a). Therefore, appellants were excluded from the operation of the Georgia Workers' Compensation Act. Appellee's argument that we should deem the employees of the subcontractor to be employees of the general contractor in order to reach the requisite number of employees was implicitly decided adversely to appellee in Bradshaw, supra.

Judgment reversed. McMurray, C. J., and Deen, P. J., concur.

DECIDED MAY 25, 1984.


Summaries of

Howell v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 25, 1984
318 S.E.2d 811 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Howell v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:HOWELL et al. v. PARKER

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 25, 1984

Citations

318 S.E.2d 811 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
318 S.E.2d 811

Citing Cases

Smith v. Cornette

In the present appeal, the evidence shows that Smith had no employees. It is clear from the findings of fact…

G M Quality Builders, Inc. v. Dennison

The award in this case contains no such showing, nor is the record evidence dispositive of this issue.…