Opinion
Argued October 10, 1906
Decided October 26, 1906
William De Graff for appellant.
Elbridge L. Adams for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that no sufficient exception was taken to the submission to the jury of the question as to whether the time in which to pay the premium had been extended; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN and CHASE, JJ. Absent: GRAY, J. Not sitting: HISCOCK, J.