From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Capelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1896
9 App. Div. 18 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Opinion

September Term, 1896.

John L. Crandell, for the appellant.

Mark Duntz, for the respondent.



The plaintiff having failed to appear upon the adjourned day, either in person or by attorney or agent, we think the statute required the justice to render a judgment of nonsuit with costs against him. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2861, 3013.) We do not think, in view of the statement made by the person representing the defendant, that he consented to the adjournment.

Judgment, reversed, with costs.

All concurred.

Judgment of County Court and of Justice's reversed, with costs.


Summaries of

Howell v. Capelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1896
9 App. Div. 18 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for

Howell v. Capelli

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM N. HOWELL, Respondent, v . JOHN CAPELLI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1896

Citations

9 App. Div. 18 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
41 N.Y.S. 106

Citing Cases

LEONARD v. RIMA

It is plain that judgment of nonsuit with costs must be rendered against a plaintiff prosecuting an action…

Kellan v. McLean

'" Full weight is given to the language of section 268 of the Justice Court Act, formerly section 3013 of the…