From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Beckley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 15, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-1812 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-1812 CKD P

09-15-2016

PRESTON ALONZO HOWELL, Petitioner, v. RONALD A. BECKLEY, Respondent.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On August 8, 2016, petitioner was ordered to file a request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee for this action within thirty days. Petitioner was warned that failure to comply with that order would result in dismissal. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not complied with the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court Assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: September 15, 2016

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
howe1812.fifp


Summaries of

Howell v. Beckley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 15, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-1812 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Howell v. Beckley

Case Details

Full title:PRESTON ALONZO HOWELL, Petitioner, v. RONALD A. BECKLEY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 15, 2016

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-1812 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2016)