From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P
Feb 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-1415 (W.D. La. Feb. 14, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-1415

02-14-2012

LAFAYETTE HOWARD FED. REG. #16886-076 v. JOSEPH P. YOUNG


JUDGE TRIMBLE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY


JUDGMENT

There being no objection to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, these findings and conclusions are accepted. Alternatively, this court concludes that the proposed findings and conclusions are entirely correct. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED THAT the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider these claims.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, Lake Charles, Louisiana, on this 14 day of ___, 2012.

___________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Howard v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P
Feb 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-1415 (W.D. La. Feb. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Howard v. Young

Case Details

Full title:LAFAYETTE HOWARD FED. REG. #16886-076 v. JOSEPH P. YOUNG

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-1415 (W.D. La. Feb. 14, 2012)