From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Tillamook Cnty.

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jun 26, 2024
333 Or. App. 554 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

A183834

06-26-2024

Sandra HOWARD and Nick Petersen, Petitioners, v. TILLAMOOK COUNTY, Respondent.

Heather A. Brann argued the case for petitioners. Also on the brief was Heather A. Brann PC. Daniel Kearns argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief was Reeve Kearns PC.


This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

Argued and submitted May 15, 2024.

Land Use Board of Appeals 2023068.

Heather A. Brann argued the case for petitioners. Also on the brief was Heather A. Brann PC.

Daniel Kearns argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief was Reeve Kearns PC.

Before Jacquot, Presiding Judge, Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM

Affrmed. Akiyama v. Tillamook County, 333 Or.App. 315, __ P.3d __ (June 26, 2024).


Summaries of

Howard v. Tillamook Cnty.

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jun 26, 2024
333 Or. App. 554 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

Howard v. Tillamook Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Sandra HOWARD and Nick Petersen, Petitioners, v. TILLAMOOK COUNTY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon

Date published: Jun 26, 2024

Citations

333 Or. App. 554 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)