From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 16, 2019
No. 79179 (Nev. Aug. 16, 2019)

Opinion

No. 79179

08-16-2019

REGINALD CLARENCE HOWARD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order denying and/or dismissing an amended postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed in district court. Thus, this appeal appears premature. See NRS 177.015(3). To the extent that appellant appeals from the order denying a motion for leave to amend a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from such an order. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Stiglich /s/_________, J.
Silver cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge

Reginald Clarence Howard

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Howard v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 16, 2019
No. 79179 (Nev. Aug. 16, 2019)
Case details for

Howard v. State

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD CLARENCE HOWARD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 16, 2019

Citations

No. 79179 (Nev. Aug. 16, 2019)