From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Apr 7, 2015
No. 05-15-00386-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2015)

Opinion

No. 05-15-00386-CR

04-07-2015

JAMES L. HOWARD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F93-02490-I

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown
Opinion by Justice Fillmore

James Howard was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of child and sentenced to forty-five years' imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Howard v. State, No. 05-95-01428-CR, 1997 WL 55850 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 12, 1997, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication). On June 6, 2014, appellant filed a motion for post-conviction DNA testing. The trial court denied appellant's motion by written order dated November 18, 2014, which included language making it effective ten days after the signing date. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court's order on March 3, 2015. We conclude we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.

"Jurisdiction concerns the power of a court to hear and determine a case." Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). The jurisdiction of an appellate court must be legally invoked, and, if not, the power of the court to act is as absent as if it did not exist. See id. at 523. "The standard to determine whether an appellate court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a case 'is not whether the appeal is precluded by law, but whether the appeal is authorized by law.'" Blanton v. State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (quoting Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008)). To invoke this Court's jurisdiction, an appellant must file his notice of appeal within the time period provided by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Blanton, 369 S.W.3d at 902; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (time to file notice of appeal); Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam).

The trial court signed the order denying appellant's motion on November 18, 2014, and, relying on State v. Rosenbaum, 818 S.W.2d 398 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991), included language making it effective as of November 28, 2014. Therefore, at the latest, his notice of appeal was due by Monday, December 29, 2014. See id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.2(a)(1). Appellant's March 3, 2015 notice of appeal is untimely, leaving us without jurisdiction over the appeal. See Blanton, 369 S.W.3d at 902; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523; Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d at 210.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
150386F.U05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F93-02490-I.
Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, Justices Bridges and Brown participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Apr 7, 2015
No. 05-15-00386-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Howard v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. HOWARD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Apr 7, 2015

Citations

No. 05-15-00386-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2015)