From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Proudlove

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
269 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted December 15, 1999

February 10, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Talley Motors, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated February 4, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a judgment against it on the issue of liability based on its failure to appear or answer, and denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Lawrence N. Rogak, Oceanside, N.Y. (Ren appellant.

Edelstein Faegenburg, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Paul J. Edelstein of counsel), for respondents.

WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO and ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To successfully oppose a motion for leave to enter a judgment based upon the defendant's failure to appear or answer in an action, the defendant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see, Pisacreta v. Joseph A. Minniti, P.C., 265 A.D.2d 540; [2d Dept., Oct. 25, 1999]). The appellant failed to do so.

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Howard v. Proudlove

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
269 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Howard v. Proudlove

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT HOWARD, et al., respondents, v. KAREN PROUDLOVE, et al., defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 865