From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Pettiford

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 10, 2008
269 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6020.

Submitted: February 28, 2008.

Decided: March 10, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (9:07-cv-00887-RBH).

Kevin Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Kevin Howard appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howard v. Pettiford, No. 9:07-cv-00887-RBH, 2007 WL 3119441 (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Howard v. Pettiford

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 10, 2008
269 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Howard v. Pettiford

Case Details

Full title:Kevin HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Dean Williams, Plaintiff, v. Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 10, 2008

Citations

269 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Collins v. Williams

Thus, "the exhaustion requirement under the PLRA has been interpreted to require prisoners to pursue…