From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Peery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2015
Case No. CV 14-1466-JLS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-1466-JLS (JEM)

10-19-2015

HILTON HOWARD, Petitioner, v. SUZANNE M. PEERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: October 19, 2015

/s/_________

JOSEPHINE L. STATON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Howard v. Peery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2015
Case No. CV 14-1466-JLS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)
Case details for

Howard v. Peery

Case Details

Full title:HILTON HOWARD, Petitioner, v. SUZANNE M. PEERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 14-1466-JLS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)