From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Foley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-00028-MMD-GWF (D. Nev. Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cv-00028-MMD-GWF

01-23-2013

CHRIS HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. DAVID FOLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER


Motion to Strike (#4)

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Exhibit A to his Complaint (#4), filed on January 17, 2013. Plaintiff filed his Complaint (#1) on January 7, 2013. Defendants have not yet filed an answer. Plaintiff now represents that he inadvertently filed as Exhibit A to his Complaint a document upon which he intended to make redactions. Plaintiff therefore seeks to strike Exhibit A from his Complaint. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff is also permitted to amend his Complaint one time as a matter of course until 21 days after being served with an answer. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Strike Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Complaint (#4) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Complaint (#1) is stricken.

______________________

GEORGE FOLEY, JR.

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Howard v. Foley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-00028-MMD-GWF (D. Nev. Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Howard v. Foley

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. DAVID FOLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cv-00028-MMD-GWF (D. Nev. Jan. 23, 2013)