From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 6, 2016
Case No. 3:14-CV-364 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 6, 2016)

Summary

finding the ALJ "must meaningfully explain why certain limitations are not included in the RFC determination -- especially when such limitations are set forth in opinions the ALJ weighs favorably"

Summary of this case from Ward v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-CV-364

01-06-2016

KATHLEEN HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #12), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full;

2. The Commissioner's non-disability determination is REVERSED;

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and

4. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court.
Date: 1-6-16

/s/_________

WALTER HERBERT RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Howard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 6, 2016
Case No. 3:14-CV-364 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 6, 2016)

finding the ALJ "must meaningfully explain why certain limitations are not included in the RFC determination -- especially when such limitations are set forth in opinions the ALJ weighs favorably"

Summary of this case from Ward v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Howard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jan 6, 2016

Citations

Case No. 3:14-CV-364 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 6, 2016)

Citing Cases

Wood v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

But, the ALJ must meaningfully explain why certain limitations are not included in the RFC determination,…

Womble v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Although the undersigned recognizes that the ALJ need only accept those limitations found credible, see Casey…