From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houston v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Jul 19, 2000
21 S.W.3d 798 (Tex. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 10-99-309-CR.

Order issued and filed July 19, 2000.

Appeal from the 292nd District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court No. F97-02839, Gary R. Stephens, Judge.

Dean M. Swanda, Attorney at Law, for Appellant(s).

Bill Hill, Criminal District Attorney, Kerry P. Fitzgerald, Asst. Criminal District Attorney, for Aappellee(s).

Before Justice VANCE, Justice GRAY, and Chief Justice McDONALD (Retired).


ABATEMENT ORDER


Appellant Houston has appealed his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child younger that 14 years of age, for which he was sentenced to 75 years in prison.

Appellant was indicted 31 August 1995 in Cause No. F9775186 for aggravated assault of a child "by penetration of the sexual organ" of the child. At trial, the Judge stated that the "State has reindicted in Cause No. F97-02839 and that we will proceed to trial in Cause No. F97-02839," which alleged aggravated assault of a child by "the contact and penetration of the sexual organ of the child."

Appellant plead not guilty, but was found guilty by the jury and sentenced to 75 years in prison.

Only the indictment in Cause No. F9775186 is contained in the clerk's record on appeal.

Appellant asserts the indictment in Cause No. F97-02839 is lost, and therefore the record fails to reflect the trial court's jurisdiction.

The State thereafter requested the District Clerk to file a Supplemental Record containing "a copy of the reindictment bearingCause No. F97-02839." The Clerk in response filed the following:

No. F9775186

State of Texas In the 292nd v. Judicial District Court David Hamilton Dallas County, Texas

Now comes the District Attorney of Dallas County and asks the Court to dismiss the above entitled and numbered cause for the following reason:

This case was reindicted as Cause No. F97-02839 and was disposed of under that case number.

Wherefore, premises considered, it is respectfully requested that this case be dismissed without prejudice.

___________/s/s Hawk___________ District Attorney, Dallas County

The Clerk did not file a copy of the indictment in Cause No. F 97-02839.

Appellant contends that "jurisdiction of the trial court vests only upon the filing of a valid indictment in the trial court," citing Cook v. State, 902 S.W.2d 471, 476 (Tex.Crim.App. 1995).

We abate the appeal in this case and order the trial court to make a factual determination as to whether the reindictment inCause No. F97-02839 was or was not filed in the 292nd District Court by the District Clerk.

The trial judge should give the State and the appellant appropriate notice, conduct a hearing if he deems same necessary, and make and return his factual determination by Supplemental Clerk's record within 45 days of this order.

The appeal is abated pending receipt of the trial judge's factual determination as to whether the reindictment in Cause No. F97-02839 was or was not ever filed in the 292nd District Court.

Appeal abated.


Summaries of

Houston v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Jul 19, 2000
21 S.W.3d 798 (Tex. App. 2000)
Case details for

Houston v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID JAY HOUSTON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Jul 19, 2000

Citations

21 S.W.3d 798 (Tex. App. 2000)