From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houston v. Milyard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 8, 2013
Civil Action: 10-cv-01892-MSK-CBS (D. Colo. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action: 10-cv-01892-MSK-CBS

05-08-2013

KYLE LEE HOUSTON, Plaintiff, v. MILYARD, et al., Defendants.

Brice A. Tondre Lisa Amatangel


Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402
Courtroom Deputy: Courtni Covington

Counsel:


Brice A. Tondre


Lisa Amatangel


COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: STATUS CONFERENCE
Court in Session: 11:04 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Plaintiff Kyle Lee Houston appears by telephone. Defendant Jean Pagette appears Pro Se.

Discussion between the court and Mr. Houston regarding releasing Mr. Tondre as his counsel. Plaintiff raises issues regarding having effective representation. Mr. Houston requests Mr. Tondre remains as his counsel.

Discussion between the court and Mr. Houston regarding his pro se filings, Docs. # 67 , # 72 and # 78. The court advises Mr. Houston it is improper to file documents in his case when he is represented by counsel.

Mr. Houston discusses his request to be released from custody. The court advises Plaintiff that the only claims before the court are those included in his Third Amended Complaint.

ORDERED: Within two weeks from today's date, Mr. Tondre shall consult with his client and file a clear definitive statement with Mr. Houston's concurrence that he wishes to be represented by Mr. Tondre and that because he is represented, Mr. Houston understands he does not have the right to file

any more documents pro se. Alternatively, if Mr. Tondre wishes to withdraw from the case, within two weeks from today's date he shall file a motion seeking leave to withdraw, or Mr. Houston shall take the affirmative step to discharge Mr. Tondre as his counsel. If Mr. Houston no longer wants Mr. Tondre to represent him, the court will attempt to replace counsel but cannot guarantee substitute counsel will be found.

ORDERED: Plaintiff's MOTION to Reopen His Administratively Closed Case [Doc. No. 62, filed November 14, 2012] is GRANTED.

ORDERED: Plaintiff's Emergency MOTION to Stop [Doc. No. 67, filed December 7, 2012], (Emergency) MOTION to Hear, and Settle the Plaintiff Claim Immediately, Through a Jury [Doc. No. 72, filed January 15, 2013], (Emergency) MOTION to Hear, and Settle the Plaintiff Claim Immediately, Through a Jury [Doc. No. 78, filed January 22, 2013] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. These motions were improperly filed by pro se Plaintiff instead of by his counsel.

ORDERED: The court finds Defendants' Motion to Strike Unauthorized Pleadings [Doc. No. 77, filed January 17, 2013] a misnomer and is DENIED.

HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess: 11:51 a.m.
Total time in court: 00:47

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.


Summaries of

Houston v. Milyard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 8, 2013
Civil Action: 10-cv-01892-MSK-CBS (D. Colo. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Houston v. Milyard

Case Details

Full title:KYLE LEE HOUSTON, Plaintiff, v. MILYARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

Civil Action: 10-cv-01892-MSK-CBS (D. Colo. May. 8, 2013)