From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houston Cas. Co. v. Prosight Specialty Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 28, 2020
18 CIVIL 9574 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 9574 (PAE)

05-28-2020

HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. PROSIGHT SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated May 27, 2020, the Court holds that NYUHC and its subrogee HCC are entitled to the fees incurred in litigating New York Marine's duty to defend. The Court denies HCC's request to file a reply, Dkt. 41, and New York Marine's request for a sur-reply, Dkt. 42; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

May 28, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Houston Cas. Co. v. Prosight Specialty Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 28, 2020
18 CIVIL 9574 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Houston Cas. Co. v. Prosight Specialty Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. PROSIGHT SPECIALTY INSURANCE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 28, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 9574 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2020)