From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

House v. House

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 8, 1981
399 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

Nos. 80-2471, 80-2472.

June 2, 1981. Rehearing Denied July 8, 1981.

Appeals from a non-final order from Circuit Court, Dade County; James C. Henderson, Judge.

Edward C. Vining, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Jack J. Taffer, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


We hold that the trial court had the discretion to order that fees and costs totalling $18,504.59 awarded to the wife's attorney be paid over a period of approximately thirty (30) months, Harder v. Harder, 331 So.2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. den., 342 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 1976), and that no abuse of that discretion is shown on the record before us.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

House v. House

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 8, 1981
399 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

House v. House

Case Details

Full title:ROSEMARY T. HOUSE, APPELLANT, v. HUGH A. HOUSE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 8, 1981

Citations

399 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Young, Stern Tannenbaum v. Ernst

As the trial court had the power to permit lump sum alimony to be paid in installments, Thompson v. Thompson,…

Gallow v. Gallow

We think the trial court erred in either not entering a final judgment for said amount in favor of the…