From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

House Herrmann v. Lucas

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 18, 1929
36 F.2d 51 (4th Cir. 1929)

Opinion

No. 2886.

November 18, 1929.

On Petition to Review the Decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Petition by House Herrmann, Inc., to review a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals, opposed by Robert H. Lucas, Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Decision of Board of Tax Appeals affirmed.

David J. Shorb, of Washington, D.C. (Earle W. Wallick and Ben Jenkins, both of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner.

Andrew D. Sharpe, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen. (Sewall Key, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., C.M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and John MacC. Hudson, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before PARKER and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges, and GLENN, District Judge.


This is an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. The question involved is purely one of fact, viz. the value of the good will of the business acquired by petitioner. The Board had before it not only opinion evidence as to this, but also all the facts as to the amount invested in the business and its earnings and expenses over a long period of time. The finding was supported by the evidence, and there is nothing to show that the Board abused its discretion or proceeded upon any erroneous view of the law. In such case, this court has no power to review the finding or to substitute its judgment for that of the Board.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

House Herrmann v. Lucas

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 18, 1929
36 F.2d 51 (4th Cir. 1929)
Case details for

House Herrmann v. Lucas

Case Details

Full title:HOUSE HERRMANN, Inc., v. LUCAS, Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 18, 1929

Citations

36 F.2d 51 (4th Cir. 1929)

Citing Cases

Shunk v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Whether good will existed and its value were questions of fact for the Tax Court. House Herrmann v. Lucas, 4…

American Sav. Bank Trust Co. v. Burnet

It must be conceded that there was substantial evidence to support the ultimate finding of fact by the Board…