From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houck v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 29, 2012
1:ll-cv-6041-CL (D. Or. Mar. 29, 2012)

Opinion

1:ll-cv-6041-CL

03-29-2012

MYSON J. HOUCK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#15), and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I conclude the R & R is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#15) is adopted. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Houck v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 29, 2012
1:ll-cv-6041-CL (D. Or. Mar. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Houck v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MYSON J. HOUCK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 29, 2012

Citations

1:ll-cv-6041-CL (D. Or. Mar. 29, 2012)