From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hottle v. BDO Seidman, LLP

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Feb 19, 2003
817 A.2d 109 (Conn. 2003)

Opinion

Decided February 19, 2003


The petition by Dean M. Hottle for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 74 Conn. App. 271 (AC 22636/AC 22666), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the arbitration clause was enforceable?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16941.

William J. Wenzel, in support of the petition.

Donald E. Frechette, in opposition.


Summaries of

Hottle v. BDO Seidman, LLP

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Feb 19, 2003
817 A.2d 109 (Conn. 2003)
Case details for

Hottle v. BDO Seidman, LLP

Case Details

Full title:DEAN M. HOTTLE v. BDO SEIDMAN, LLP, BDO SEIDMAN, LLP v. DEAN M. HOTTLE

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Feb 19, 2003

Citations

817 A.2d 109 (Conn. 2003)
817 A.2d 109

Citing Cases

Hottle v. BDO Seidman, LLP

We granted the petition for certification to appeal filed by the plaintiff in the first case and the…