From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hotel Prince George Affiliates v. Grimbilas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 1, 1997
241 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 1, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.).


The IAS Court properly held that it lacked jurisdiction to set aside the global settlement since numerous necessary parties in the related actions were not before it. Further, since a stipulation of discontinuance had been filed, the actions were terminated and the stipulation could only be set aside in a separate plenary action ( see, D'Amico v. Nuzzo, 194 A.D.2d 761). To the extent appellant and his clients seek further relief for alleged wrongs committed by other parties, they may commence a separate action or seek arbitration pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement. We have considered appellant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Hotel Prince George Affiliates v. Grimbilas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 1, 1997
241 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Hotel Prince George Affiliates v. Grimbilas

Case Details

Full title:HOTEL PRINCE GEORGE AFFILIATES, Appellant, v. GEORGIA O. GRIMBILAS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 473

Citing Cases

Megibow v. Troncale

While the basis for entitlement to such discovery is not made clear, this is not the reason plaintiff states…

MAHONSKI v. State of NY

Because the proceeding in this case was terminated by the parties' stipulation, respondents' sole remedy was…