From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hotel McAllister v. Coburn

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 17, 1927
18 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1927)

Opinion

No. 4848.

March 17, 1927.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; William I. Grubb, Judge.

Action by George H. Coburn against the Hotel McAllister. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

St. Clair Adams, of New Orleans, La., and John C. Gramling, of Miami, Fla. (Gramling Flowers, of Miami, Fla., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

John S. Benz and E.B. Kurtz, both of Miami, Fla. (Kurtz Reed and Shutts Bowen, all of Miami, Fla., on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.


Defendant in error, plaintiff below, brought suit to recover damages for false imprisonment, to which the defendant filed a plea of not guilty. The case was tried to a jury, and resulted in a verdict for $3,500, on which judgment was entered.

The only errors assigned are as follows: (1) the verdict is contrary to the evidence; (2) the damages fixed by said verdict are excessive; (3) the verdict is in contravention with the instructions of the court. The errors assigned present nothing for review in this court. The entire evidence, apparently, is brought up in the record; but, as there was no motion to direct a verdict, we are not at liberty to examine it, with the view of reversing the judgment.

Plaintiff in error also suggests that the record does not show jurisdiction in the District Court by diversity of citizenship. This question was not raised in the District Court. The declaration alleges that the plaintiff is a resident and citizen of the state of New Jersey and defendant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Florida. We do not understand that, under the practice in Florida, this averment is denied by a plea of not guilty, which goes merely to a denial of the wrongful act upon which the action is based. Varnes v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., 80 Fla. 624, 86 So. 433. Furthermore, we think this question is also settled by the verdict.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hotel McAllister v. Coburn

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 17, 1927
18 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1927)
Case details for

Hotel McAllister v. Coburn

Case Details

Full title:HOTEL McALLISTER v. COBURN

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 17, 1927

Citations

18 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1927)

Citing Cases

Western Produce Co. v. Folliard

No motion was made for a directed verdict, and the assignments of error do not present matters cognizable…

Swift Co. v. Ellinor

The sole question presented for our decision on the merits is whether this amount is excessive. We therefore…