From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hossain v. Rahman–Hossain

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 8, 2012
99 So. 3d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2D12–4165.

2012-10-8

Romel M. HOSSAIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Shaila RAHMAN–HOSSAIN, Appellee/Respondent(s).


BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

The wife's motion for appellate attorney's fees is remanded to the trial court. If the wife establishes her entitlement pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes (2012), and Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697 (Fla.1997), the trial court is authorized to award her all or a portion of the reasonable appellate attorney's fees. See Rados v. Rados, 791 So.2d 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

SILBERMAN, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Hossain v. Rahman–Hossain

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 8, 2012
99 So. 3d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Hossain v. Rahman–Hossain

Case Details

Full title:Romel M. HOSSAIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Shaila RAHMAN–HOSSAIN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Oct 8, 2012

Citations

99 So. 3d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)