From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hosier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct 3, 2012
98 So. 3d 696 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–3921.

2012-10-3

Robert J. HOSIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Robert Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 2004–CF–813 and 2005–CF–431. Robert J. Hosier, Wewahitchka, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Robert Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 2004–CF–813 and 2005–CF–431.
Robert J. Hosier, Wewahitchka, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. With respect to the claim the appellant raised in his brief but not in his motion, questioning a reduction in the total days of credit against his sentence made by his prison classification officer several months after he was sentenced, he should exhaust his administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections and then, if necessary, file an extraordinary petition against the department in the Leon County circuit court. Bush v. State, 945 So.2d 1207, 1213–14 (Fla.2006).

POLEN, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hosier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct 3, 2012
98 So. 3d 696 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Hosier v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert J. HOSIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Oct 3, 2012

Citations

98 So. 3d 696 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)