From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 2, 1928
163 N.E. 303 (Ohio 1928)

Opinion

No. 21059

Decided May 2, 1928.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Tim Long, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Edward C. Stanton, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Jack A. Persky, for defendant in error.


It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE, ROBINSON and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Horton v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 2, 1928
163 N.E. 303 (Ohio 1928)
Case details for

Horton v. State

Case Details

Full title:HORTON v. THE STATE OF OHIO

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 2, 1928

Citations

163 N.E. 303 (Ohio 1928)
163 N.E. 303