From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hortman v. J.H. Morris Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 5, 1933
163 A. 663 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Argued October 25, 1932 —

Decided January 5, 1933.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the appellant, Frank I. Casey.

For the respondent, James J. McGoogan.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 262.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Hortman v. J.H. Morris Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 5, 1933
163 A. 663 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

Hortman v. J.H. Morris Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES HORTMAN, APPELLANT, v. J.H. MORRIS COMPANY, RESPONDENT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 5, 1933

Citations

163 A. 663 (N.J. 1933)
163 A. 663

Citing Cases

Holden v. Rolff

Catterall v. Otis Elevator Co., 103 N.J.L. 381. The second reason argued on the rule was that the plaintiff…