From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horsman v. Williams

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Nov 16, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:04cv818-MHT (M.D. Ala. Nov. 16, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:04cv818-MHT.

November 16, 2006


ORDER


On 23 October 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #83) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation be and is hereby adopted;
2. That the defendants' motions for summary judgment be and are hereby GRANTED;
3. By separate order, judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants;
4. That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and
5. That costs of this proceeding be and are hereby taxed against the plaintiff.


Summaries of

Horsman v. Williams

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Nov 16, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:04cv818-MHT (M.D. Ala. Nov. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Horsman v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM WILES HORSMAN, III, #110184, Plaintiff, v. SIDNEY T. WILLIAMS, et…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Nov 16, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:04cv818-MHT (M.D. Ala. Nov. 16, 2006)

Citing Cases

Woodfin v. Johnson

See Vann v. Angelone, 73 F.3d 519, 523 (4th Cir. 1996) ("The Constitution simply does not speak to the…

Williams v. Johnson

See Grimm, 2011 WL 3321474, at *3; Woodfin, 2011 WL 3101792, at *3: see also Vann v. Angelone, 73 F.3d 519,…