From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horsley v. Nat'l Park Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 12, 2013
2:12-CV-2185 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Apr. 12, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-CV-2185 JCM (PAL)

04-12-2013

GAIL R. HORSLEY, Plaintiff(s), v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER

Presently before the court is defendants', National Park Service and United States Department of the Interior, motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 6). Plaintiff filed a non-opposition. (Doc. # 7).

Also before the court is plaintiff's motion to substitute party, or, in the alternative, motion for leave to amend complaint. (Doc. # 8). Defendants filed a non-opposition. (Doc. # 9).

Plaintiff filed suit against the defendants following her alleged fall and resulting injury at the Hoover Dam. The motion to dismiss argues, among other things, that the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 requires that the United States, and not the defendants named in this case, be the named defendant. See, e.g., Corey v. McNamara, 409 F.Supp.2d 1225, 1228-29 (D. Nev. 2006) (stating "the United States is the only proper defendant in cases alleging tortious conduct."). Plaintiff filed a non-opposition to the motion to dismiss provided that plaintiff could either substitute in the United States as the correct defendant or amend her complaint.

Plaintiff also agreed to the dismissal of the Doe and Roe defendants with prejudice. Those parties are dismissed with prejudice.

The court finds it appropriate to allow plaintiff to amend her complaint. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint with the court within ten days of this order.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. # 6) be, and the same hereby, is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to substitute party, or in the alternative, motion for leave to amend complaint (doc. # 8) be, and the same hereby, is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint with the court within ten days of this order.

______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Horsley v. Nat'l Park Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 12, 2013
2:12-CV-2185 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Apr. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Horsley v. Nat'l Park Serv.

Case Details

Full title:GAIL R. HORSLEY, Plaintiff(s), v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 12, 2013

Citations

2:12-CV-2185 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Apr. 12, 2013)