From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horowitz v. Alley Pond Park Apartments No. 1

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1961
14 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

October 30, 1961


In an action to recover an alleged balance due for the reasonable value of work, labor, services and materials, the plaintiffs appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 6, 1960, which denied their cross motion to serve an amended complaint, and which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the existing complaint, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, based upon a previous order and judgment of said court confirming the award made by the arbitrators in an arbitration proceeding between plaintiffs and defendant Big-W Construction Corp. ( Matter of Big-W Constr. Corp. [ Horowitz], 14 A.D.2d 817); and (2) from a judgment of said court dated September 9, 1960, in favor of defendants, entered on said order of September 6, 1960. Order and judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Horowitz v. Alley Pond Park Apartments No. 1

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1961
14 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Horowitz v. Alley Pond Park Apartments No. 1

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL HOROWITZ et al., Copartners Doing Business as HOROWITZ RUBIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1961

Citations

14 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)