From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 22, 1963
148 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

Opinion

No. 62-768.

January 22, 1963.

Ellis Rubin, Miami, for petitioner.

Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty., and Joseph Durant, Asst. State Atty., for respondent.

Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.


This matter coming on before the court on a stipulation and an order of the trial court as to a certified question relating to certain "costs", and it appearing that a ruling on the petition for costs would be reviewable pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.16(c), F.A.R., 31 F.S.A., the certificate is, therefore, denied.


Summaries of

Horner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 22, 1963
148 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
Case details for

Horner v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. HORNER, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 22, 1963

Citations

148 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

Citing Cases

Craft v. Clarembeaux

Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal (from an order taxing costs) was grounded on the conclusion that…

City of Hallandale v. Chatlos

There are decisions to the effect that a cost judgment is reviewable only by petition under F.A.R. 3.16(c).…